The longest peer-review in history?


It’s 10 months since Tim Loughton, shadow children’s minister, asked when the evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System would be published, and received the reply:

“The draft of this report is currently being peer-reviewed, and it will be published once the report has been completed.”

The Integrated Children’s System (ICS) is the third ‘core’ database in the children’s trilogy: it holds a record of every child’s contact with social care services and consists of a series of online forms. Amongst other things, it has been criticised by social workers for reducing the assessment of children at risk of harm to a mechanised process, ill-suited to the reality of child protection work.

The evaluation, commissioned by the DfES, was submitted in September 2006. Since then the silence has been deafening. Could it be that the report is less than enthusiastic about ICS?


2 Responses to The longest peer-review in history?

  1. […] sign yet of the evaluation of the Integrated Children’s System.Tick tock…14 months since it was submitted to DfES… Hmmm. They really must have hated […]

  2. […] Getting on for 15 months now. Almost a year after his last attempt, shadow children’s minister Tim Loughton has had […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: